RRoom
 GB-ANALYSTS REPORTS
  
Integrated Knowledge-Based Analyses of Socio-Economic Issues

 

Report Catalogue Data

  Report Class   General Public Report
  Analysis Type   Development Thrusts
  Issue Category   Community Development
  Release Date   03_13_2008
  Last Update  
  Reference Code   GPR-DT.CD.CTC-20080313-NCL

Crafts, Trades and Corporations Founding
Native Crafts Leveraging


Another Governmental infrastructure that should and must be implemented is the Native-crafts leveraging Infrastructure. The truth of the situation is that every society has at least a craft by which the society survives. This leveraging should immediately empower the natives by vesting them with the profits of economy of scale, and as such enable them to realize higher return on investment.  Every Government must develop the infrastructure to leverage these crafts-operations into large scale operations. Two benefits develops from such actions: additional employment positions are immediately created to support other peoples who are not otherwise practitioners of the craft and also for other people who become practitioners of the craft. This actually creates division of labor and as such brings about efficiency to the practice of the crafts and correspondingly higher volume of production. On the part of overall development of the society, such leveraging infrastructure will continually result in the elevation of low-skill workers into first tier entrepreneurs of the region. These entrepreneur to some undefinable extent may just turn out to fund other ventures having developed the mindset of entrepreneurs.

There really are two approaches, or infrastructure, from the perspective of economic development, to the art of leveraging the native-crafts: one approach has the production forces and the marketing forces separated and fused into individual operating units, and the second approach continues to maintain separate production forces while fusing the marketing forces into a different entity for efficiency of production. The first approach is akin to the founding of corporation through mergers and acquisitions, and the end-result of the approach may be termed as Crafts-Based Corporations; and the second approach is founding corporations that properly are Cooperatives, and the end result of this approach  may therefore be termed as Crafts-Based Cooperatives. Some insight into the art can be

 
 gained from a cursory chat-room analysis of leveraging ethanol production craft in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Yet social welfare aspects of these approaches are worth being discussed here as such are quite informative. First the discussion is focused on founding the Crafts-Driven Cooperatives, and then on founding the Crafts-Based Corporations.

Crafts-Driven Cooperatives Infrastructure as already noted has the marketing forces of crafts businesses, separated and fused into a different entity for efficiency of production while continuing to maintain separate production forces. Hence the founding of such cooperatives essentially collects the marketing forces of several autonomous small crafts businesses and fuses these into a separate entity thereby vesting these several small business economy of scale for marketing the product-crafts of these businesses. This infrastructure is particularly suited to societies with disparate communities. Such communities may be disparate for more than one reason: the communities are disparate geographically being forcibly separated into small communities by the forces of geography; the communities may be disparate ethnically being of different ethnic origin yet have subsisted on the same crafts being proximate to each other over the years and therefore developed similar tools of subsistence. The assertion that this form of infrastructure better supports the communities that are geographically disparate is buttressed by the recognition that in general these individual communities neither have large land masses to support the construction of large corporations nor even large population to support the employment needs of large corporations. On the other hand, the assertion that this form of infrastructure better supports the communities that are ethnically disparate is buttressed by the recognition that in general these individual communities have remained small because over the years they may have developed lack of trust in each other and may have even fought several wars and as a result being unable to fused into a union; and of course these


communities like the geographically disparate communities also will not have even the large population necessary to support the employment needs of large corporations.

Crafts-Based Corporation Infrastructure as already noted has the production forces and the marketing forces of crafts businesses, separated and fused into individual operating units. Hence the founding of such corporations essentially collects the production forces and the marketing forces of several autonomous small crafts businesses and fuses these into individual operating units. This infrastructure is suited to societies with disparate and non-disparate communities, but with the common characteristic of geographical contiguity and and surrounding unoccupied large land masses. The geographical contiguity essentially enables the pooling of the population necessary to support large employment needs of corporations, while the proximate unoccupied land masses avail open regions usable for developing large corporations. The social factors regarding the homogeneity characteristic of the community are readily addressed through corporate policies, rules and regulations. 

In each case, the role of the government therefore is in abstracting a unifying construct with the singular goal of facilitating the economic development and consequentially the social welfare of the communities.


Directory of Services:  Advertise with Us | Analysis Request | Focus Group
Privacy Policy  |  Site Navigation  |  Terms of Use

 Webloogle Blog Directory
Things are not always as they seem! Scratch beyond the surface and the truth is  always different.   
 Company   © 1999 - 2009 Nkassens Trust. All rights reserved