|
Immobilization of fermentation
reactions microbes has gained wide use and study, however, the
variables are so many that proper organization of the properties are
effective for supporting fermentation reactor designs and analyses.
The motivation for the immobilization of microbes are many and
includes, the ready separation of the microbes from the final
product for continuous operations, enable the use of pathogenic
microbes without the risk of pathogenic attacks, and to enable the
design of more complex reactors that can overcome certain reaction
limiting conditions. Remarkably the immobilization of microbes has
followed the same technique as used for the immobilization of
enzymes. However, the larger size of microbes has influenced the
techniques.
Immobilized enzymes, however,
were known to change their
characteristics, stability
and even kinetic properties; and
immobilized microbes have also shown the same changes in
characteristics and stability, and possibly even kinetic properties. The variations in the characteristics
of immobilized microbes however are likely more than as is with
enzymes, for one reason because the microbes still have the
capability for growth. At a minimum the immobilization of microbes is impacted by
several factors:
-
immobilization method
-
geometric Shape of microbe,
-
geometric shape of immobilization
substance,
-
point of immobilization of
microbes,
-
length of the immobilization
substance,
Each of these affects the
performance because of the degree of solute penetrability that
results after the immobilization, as can be surmised from the
presentation below.
Immobilization Method
As for immobilized enzymes two
broad types of methods have been used to immobilize microorganisms:
attachment to a support and entrapment. The details of the types of
immobilizations are as shown in Table 1 - Methods of Immobilization.
The corresponding enzyme immobilization issues of these methods have
been
well-documented, except for biofilm formation which is unique
to growth organisms as bacteria.
Currently the Biofilm formation
as an immobilization seem most common with bacteria, and as a case
where bacteria in the planktonic state are made to grow on an
immobilization support specifically selected for the objective and
therefore becoming a sessile colony of microbes, over which
substrate broth can flow. The study and use of biofilm formations is
of
intense interest and study.
However, for the specific
issue being delineated presently with respect to solute
penetrability of the immobilized microbes matrix, only the
Attachment methods are of the greatest impact; and most of the
|
analysis subsumes one of this form of
immobilization of the microbes, particularly the use of the method
of covalent bonding.
|
Table
1
Methods of Immobilization |
|
Method |
Immobilization Device |
|
Attachment |
Aggregation Cross-linking
(No support) |
Covalent binding
Ionic-exchangers Binding
Adsorption Binding
Biofilm formation |
|
Entrapment |
Organic polymer
Inorganic polymer
Semi-permeable membrane |
Geometric Shape of Microbes
The fermentation microbes have
variety of shapes, and surface biochemical compositions and as such
each one will get immobilize to the immobilization in some
preferred but unique orientation from the others, depending on the
immobilization circumstance. Naturally this immobilization
orientation variation will undoubtedly impact the solute
penetrability characteristic of the specific microbe and hence
impact the effectiveness of the immobilized microbe in carry out the
oxidative consumption of of the substrates.
The shape is also critical
particularly if the Plasma Membrane transporters of the microbe
should have a preferred orientation and such orientation be such
that the transporters are aligned away from the bulk Mash or broth.
Then clearly the diffusion of the mash substances becomes critical
in the performance of the microbes as a fermentation agent.
Geometric shape of Immobilization
Substance
The immobilization substance
geometry also will impact the performance of the microbes after the
immobilization. Obviously straight lateral oriented substance that
supports lateral immobilization will result in more packing than
non-straight, even if, lateral oriented devices as such devices may
prevent uniform one-to-one immobilization between the microbes and
immobilization points on the device.
Point of immobilization of
microbes
The point of
immobilization also impacts the penetrability of the microbe matrix
that results from the immobilization. As briefly observed above, the
microbes if immobilized along an orientation that the forces the
Plasma Membrane Transporter to face a direction away
from the bulk of the broth, then such immobilized microbes may just
perform sub-par.
However, there is even the
more critical situation where the point of immobilization may be
such as to stunt or inhibit growth of the microbes -- the form of
growth being discussed here goes beyond individual cell enlargement
in size but possibly cell division as well. Of course, stunted
growth is the more serious of the two forms of impact from
consideration.
|
|
advertisement |
|
now available... Click Image↑
to Buy |
|
Coming soon !
details |
Length of the immobilization Substance
The length of the substance
for the immobilization of the microbes also would affect the
performance: Obviously when relatively lengthy substances are used,
then the microbes just may be far away enough from the primary
carrier to have a dynamic of wash as the substrate broth flows over
the carrier. While this situation might completely eliminate the
issue of penetrability, this method of immobilization just lead to
leaching of microbes and thereby defeat the entire purpose of the
immobilization.
Dangling Immobilization Issues
in comparison with enzyme
immobilization, the immobilization of microbes raises the issue of
microbes growth. One of two situation develops for consideration:
The immobilization process must either prevent cell division growth
of the microbes or support spontaneous immobilization of the
microbes which could only be supported in the use of microbes that
readily form biofilms.
The latter case of biofilm
formation which requires stagnant broth for the fermentation
obviously restricts the operation to
batch fermentation
reactors only. Evidently, the former case then offers more
flexibility for reactor design apparently.
|