Although, apparently not providing commercial incentive for any business corporation to want to undertake as a venture, a recently proffered GHG effects remediation technology offers efficacious removal of the carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere and hence the possibility of actually supporting the incremental reversal of the effect of GHG on the world climate. Notwithstanding, the implementation of the technology is essential towards addressing the concerns of Global Warming and the need to remediate the potential impact. An issue that comes up almost immediately is the matter of implementation of the technology.  The implementation of such technology therefore need be assumed by World Bodies in the interest of the general welfare of humanity, as suggested.

Obviously, if the project as a result of the technology can not be projected as profitable, then the implementation of the project would not be borne by any commercial venture that must report to its associates. The fact is that such undertaking would be an anathema to one component of the mission statement of all business corporations.

Technology Implementation

Clearly because of the geographical scope involved in tackling the implementation, a detailed construction of a set of criteria should be beneficial, and with some consideration the following criteria for entity qualification for implementation obtain:

The further delineation of these criteria is informative in eliciting the need for the criteria contents.

First and fore most the default case, where the choice implementation entity shall be immune from the state of profitability of the project, justifies the choice of a not-for-Profit organization.

In view of the global nature of the problem and the impact of atmospheric dynamics in transporting the GHG from region to region, the implementation of the technology must necessarily be global to

The constituent technologies of the remediation technologies indisputably is anticipated to be capital intensive as will also be the implementation. hence the implementation entity must have  the capacity to finance the project or have access to entity (ies) with capital as to have the project financed. the source of funds must also be able, albeit collectively, to support over-runs as such projects are likely to be and usually are.

Conviction of responsibility has always driven people to complete tasks that are assumed. hence the implementation entity must have conviction of responsibility as to complete the task for every regional sector of the global without bias or prejudice. This is an essential requirement given that a poorly implemented project is bound to invariably impact the whole world through the redistributive effect of the atmospheric dynamics of transport as earlier indicated.

Furthermore, some of the technology components from which the remediation technology was integrated are under or prospectively under the intellectual property rights ownership of the United States Government, as these were developed in national laboratories. hence the use of those technologies in the integrated form requires licensing from the United States Government, a task that can only be undertaken by governmental agencies of some form.

Indeed, from all indications the best suited entity for this project is the United Nations or a representative of the UN contracted to undertake or oversee the implementation of such a global project. Undoubtedly, the UN or its representative contractors may be able to manage the project under the United nations Millennium Development Program with particular consideration for environmental degradation prevention.

Mechanics of Implementation

The implementation of such projects under UN assignment to NGOs, familiar with the regions and involved in other regional projects, also may be just as efficacious in meeting the criteria.

  Company