RRoom
 GB-ANALYSTS REPORTS
 
Integrated Knowledge-Based Analyses of Socio-Economic Issues

Report Catalogue Data

  Report Class   General Public Report
  Analysis Type   The Entrepreneur
  Issue Category   New Venture Development
  Release Date   04_28_2008
  Last Update   03_13_2009
  Reference Code   GPR-TE.NVD.DBP-20080428-TBP

Developing Business Plan
 Types of Business Plans


Two issues come into play developing an approach to preparing any Business Plan: Determination of the content of a business plan, and Recognition of the actual components of the business plan. Indeed until now the actual components of a Business Plan have not been made quite explicit, as all discourse has focused on understanding the functional objective, which is to provide performance snapshot of the steady-state operation of the business at some point in time in the future. By this defined functional objective then, a Business Plan must derive from the growth plans developed for the venture entity.

However, the growth plans and the number of such growth plans for a specific entity depends on the operating form of the entity as per visualized by the entrepreneur. As already noted, regarding the essence of Business Plans the extent of visualization of an entity by the founding entrepreneur is constrained to become consistent with the most proximate lifecycle stage of the entity as definable from an analysis of the Corporate Lifecycle of the Adizes Principle. Hence a tenable position, at least at first iteration, is that before even an entrepreneur begins to write a business plan, the specific type of business plan appropriate for the venture based on the lifecycle stage of existence of the venture, is subject to the future-time period for which the entrepreneur can envision the entity. Each of the lifecycle stage is also characterized by a specific organization structure, hence a characteristic set of growth plans. Identification and analysis of the growth plans descriptive for a specific entity necessarily demands the construction of the organization hierarchy for a company in the corporate lifecycle stage descriptive of the entity. In effect then determining  the business plan that is applicable for a particular venture boils down to defining the organizational hierarchy for the entity.

Obviously, this determination then explains the dominant reason for the difficulty in determination of the right business plan for a specific business: The aforementioned two issues at play are so complex, interactive and intimately tied into the tasks and activities of the business entities that as a result of the interactive dynamic there are can be, possibly twenty variants of venture growth Plans. An understanding of these twenty variants of business plans obtains only through a detailed analysis of the business functional tasks, as categorized by the time-honored organizational structure, that must characteristically be performed by any venture in each stage of provide Adizes Corporate Lifecycle Curve, that every venture necessarily possibly evolve into.


However, restricting the focus, for the moment, to the standard functional requirements of a corporation, given that such requirement essentially stems from military organizational norms, a venture entity must necessarily have organizational layers that attend to such issues as Corporate Strategic Goal, Growth Strategic Plan, Growth Tactics Plans, Growth Tactics Implementation Plans, and Operations Plans.

The rationale for restricting focus to the standard defined functional requirement of a corporation is supported by the assessment under Rationalizing the Mindset, that the vision of the entrepreneur should necessarily cause the founding of a corporation.

A clear understanding of the requirements of each organizational layer of functional tasks, is essential to the formation, stability and mission specific efficacious operation of the corporation. The recognition is that the salient characteristics of any corporation are its operations-specific functional tasks that deal with the institution of efficiency in the performance of these tasks.

In the seemingly convoluted nature of paradoxes, the upper layers define the lower layers, which in turn define, beginning with the Operations layer, the internal structures of the upper layers. This situation arises from the fact the Operations layers can be and is often defined through Porters Strategic Forces Model. the decoupling of the paradoxical state can then be accomplished with methods from Art of Learning Organizations by Peter Seng .

On the basis of the analysis so far performed clearly, the entrepreneur who is faced with the task of preparing a business plan must adopt the perspective that a Business Plan as required is actually composed of three corporate management plans: The Growth Strategic Plan, The Growth Tactical Plan and the Growth Tactics Implementation Plan, given that only these plans are forward looking as required by the functional objective of the Business Plan. These are usually packaged into a single unit for purposes of presentation to venture Funding firms and commercial banks.

Rationally, Business Plan can now be said to be the same as the Growth Tactics Plan. However, because the Tactical Plan is cerebral and the Operations are practical and usually the cerebral tasks need to be translated into substantive practical tasks, the transitioning of the cerebral strategy to the practical tactics, is frequently accomplished with the Growth Tactics Implementation Plan; which is   usually made part of The Business Plan as Plan Appendixes.

 

advertisement

now available... Click Imageto Buy

 More specifically, then, the Implementation Plans is recommended to be made the Appendix of the Growth Tactics Business Plan. At a minimum then, The Business Plan must now consists of the following

  • Business Plan :- Growth Tactical Plan
  • Appendixes:- Growth Tactics Implementation Plan

However, for all intents and purposes, the Growth-Tactics Implementation Plan usually has the same sequence of contents as the Growth Tactical Plan.

Now then going forward, the posture towards developing the Business Plan for all intents and purposes should be that the Business Plan is the same as the Growth Tactics Plan. This then is the material that may be made available to banks and financiers. Because this document is more cerebral than practical, its release to the banks and financiers do not pose the risk of losing the entrepreneur's idea for his own venture. Yet it must be understood that the Functional Business Plan is documentations of the Growth Tactics Plan and the Growth Tactics Implementation Plan. Hence, the entrepreneur must recognize that the Implementation Plan must never be parted with even for a moment. Interested parties may view the Plan under the watchful eyes of the entrepreneur, even as is advocated for the Business Plan Appendixes in White's Entrepreneur's Guide.


Directory of Services:  Advertise with Us | Analysis Request | Focus Group
Privacy Policy  |  Site Navigation  |  Terms of Use

 Webloogle Blog Directory
Things are not always as they seem! Scratch beyond the surface and the truth is  always different.   
 Company   © 1999 - 2009 Nkassens Trust. All rights reserved